top of page

What Your Blood Type Has to Do With Your Diet: Nothing

  • 6 hours ago
  • 3 min read

A friend at a dinner party once turned down the bread basket because she was "type A, and grains don't agree with her blood." I nodded, passed the butter, and spent the rest of the meal thinking about lectins instead of listening to the conversation. Occupational hazard.


The blood type diet has been around since 1996, when naturopath Peter D'Adamo published Eat Right 4 Your Type [1]. Its premise: your ABO blood type reflects your ancestors' diet, so eating in accordance with your type optimizes digestion and health. Type O, the "hunter," should eat like a caveman: high protein, minimal grains. Type A, the "agrarian," should go largely vegetarian. Type B gets dairy. Type AB gets a little of everything, marketed as the "enigma" for reasons that say more about branding than biology.


The mechanism, as advertised

The theory rests on lectins: proteins found throughout the plant kingdom, concentrated in legumes and grains, that bind to carbohydrate molecules. D'Adamo's claim is that dietary lectins interact with the antigens on your red blood cells the way incompatible blood interacts in a transfusion reaction, causing agglutination, clumping, and a cascade of downstream health problems specific to your type [2].


If you work in transfusion medicine, you already know where this goes wrong.


What agglutination actually requires

Agglutination in a clinically meaningful sense requires antibody binding to a compatible antigen, at a concentration and in an environment that supports crosslinking. It is not a generic hazard that any given protein produces on contact with blood. The lectin literature bears this out: a systematic review of blood type diet claims found no controlled evidence that dietary lectins clump blood cells inside the body in a type-specific way [3]. Most food lectins denature with cooking. Of the ones that survive digestion intact, the review found the overwhelming majority react with all ABO types indiscriminately, not selectively with one [3].


There is a small, real exception: raw legumes contain lectins with some blood-type-preferential agglutinating activity in vitro [4]. But "some lectin behaves selectively in a test tube" is a long way from "your dinner is attacking your blood type."


What the trials actually show

A few groups have tested the diet's health claims directly rather than the mechanism. The most-cited systematic review, Cusack et al. in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, found that while several of the individual "type" diets were associated with favorable changes in metabolic risk markers, the effect held regardless of the subject's actual blood type [3]. In other words: the Type O diet made people healthier whether or not they were Type O. The diets are, structurally, healthier eating patterns. Less processed food, more vegetables, controlled portions. People who follow any of them tend to do better than people who don't, and the ABO matching adds nothing measurable on top of that [3].


A separate analysis, Wang et al. in PLoS ONE, looked directly at ABO genotype against the diet's proposed cardiometabolic outcomes and found no interaction: type didn't predict which diet worked better for whom [5].


Why it persists anyway

None of this has hurt sales. The obvious answer is that personalization sells better than generic advice, and blood type is one of the few pieces of biology most people can actually name about themselves. "Eat less processed food" is true and unsatisfying. "Eat less processed food because you are Type A" is a story, and stories are what people remember at dinner parties.


There's a less cynical read too. We want our biology to explain us: why we feel good after some meals and sluggish after others, why one relative thrives on a diet that wrecks another. ABO type is legible in a way gut microbiome composition or polygenic metabolic risk isn't. It's one letter, drawn on a card in your wallet, and it feels like it should mean more than it does.


It doesn't. Eat the vegetables. Skip the antigen mapping.


References

1. D'Adamo P, Whitney C. Eat Right 4 Your Type. G.P. Putnam's Sons; 1996.

2. Nachbar MS, Oppenheim JD. Lectins in the United States diet: a survey of lectins in commonly consumed foods and a review of the literature. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980;33(11):2338-2345.

3. Cusack L, De Buck E, Compernolle V, Vandekerckhove P. Blood type diets lack supporting evidence: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(1):99-104.

4. Sharon N, Lis H. History of lectins: from hemagglutinins to biological recognition molecules. Glycobiology. 2004;14(11):53R-62R.

5. Wang J, García-Bailo B, Nielsen DE, El-Sohemy A. ABO genotype, 'blood-type' diet and cardiometabolic risk factors. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e84749.

 
 
Raymond, Caitlin M._edited.jpg

Caitlin Raymond MD/PhD

I'm a hybrid of Family Medicine and Pathology training. I write about the intersection of blood banking and informatics, medical education, and more!

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Subscribe

Thanks for submitting!

©2023 by Caitlin Raymond. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page